Greg Kochanski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> Which seems like an acceptable error message. Unfortunately, it is >> rather likely that this gets fixed in 3.3, too. > > How about this variant that defines inverse() ? > [...]
Hmm. This seems like valid code, but g++ 3.3 still rejects it.
However, this is also fixed in 3.4.
--
Falk
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
