On Mon, Jul 23, 2001 at 09:32:26PM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote: > Christopher C. Chimelis writes: > > On Mon, 23 Jul 2001, Matthias Klose wrote: > > > I don't like the current situation. we have a gcc version in woody > > > that should be removed and version in sid, which doesn't > > > propagate. > > What's the hold-up on the sid->woody move for gcc-3.0 (I haven't seen > > update-excuses yet)? I can't think of any reason to keep the version in > > woody around at all...
out of date on sparc: cpp-3.0-doc, g77-3.0-doc, gcc-3.0-base, gcc-3.0-doc, libstdc++3-doc (from 3.0.1.ds0-0pre010721) Those debs also don't appear to be built anymore? Is that a mistake or should they be removed too? Also the i386 debs seem to be out of date (also, the i386 autobuilder is hung atm). Cheers, aj -- Anthony Towns <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <http://azure.humbug.org.au/~aj/> I don't speak for anyone save myself. GPG signed mail preferred. ``_Any_ increase in interface difficulty, in exchange for a benefit you do not understand, cannot perceive, or don't care about, is too much.'' -- John S. Novak, III (The Humblest Man on the Net)
pgpAZhz8oM5uj.pgp
Description: PGP signature