Matthias Klose wrote: > > why do you propose gcc-3.0 as the "user compiler"? setting the "system > compiler" to something other than the "user compiler" would break > every C++ related development environment.
Why? We use already different version of library at the same time (almost I use it, mostly because I find nice the obsolete libg++). But yes, the default user compiler should be the system compiler. summary: user compiler: cc system compiler: gcc kernel compiler: kgcc these should be simple link (or for cc an update-alternative) to the gcc-X.YY. Thus: Could you implement kgcc (only as link), and check that alternatives priority of cc are correct for all version of gcc? giacomo