* Hakan Ardo ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: That I had written: > > Personally I'd prefer that the name is passed-as-is to the gcc/binutils > > configures; because I normally know what to give those to get what I > > want. I'd agree with adding the -linux in if it was for everything, > > but since this package has the ability to build for things Linux won't > > run on (e.g. AVR - anyone fancy a small port....) I'd rather not do it > > conditionally. > > I can see the point in that. Do we want the package names to be > gcc-avr-linux and binutils-avr-linux as well instead of simply gcc-avr and > binutils-avr?
Erm no; avr to be gcc-avr, alpha-linux to be gcc-alpha-linux ? Dave ---------------- Have a happy GNU millennium! ---------------------- / Dr. David Alan Gilbert | Running GNU/Linux on Alpha,68K| Happy \ \ gro.gilbert @ treblig.org | MIPS,x86,ARM, SPARC and HP-PA | In Hex / \ _________________________|_____ http://www.treblig.org |_______/