Hello, after some discussion with Florian Weimer I came to the conclusion, that my complaint may not make sense. Does it?
Maybe the package description should nevertheless be changed to something like "The GNU stdc++ library version 3.1" or "The GNU stdc++ library for gcc-3.1". What do you think? Jochen -- http://www.mathematik.uni-kl.de/~wwwstoch/voss/
pgpDXmIbWkpHL.pgp
Description: PGP signature
