Matthias Klose <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Jérôme Marant writes: >> Florian Weimer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> >> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Jérôme Marant) writes: >> > >> >> I've read in the gcc ML that versioning libgnat as 3.15a >> >> is erroneous, according to Robert Dewar. >> > >> > It's still in the GCC CVS... >> >> And what's problematic with deciding something on this, >> from GCC people point of view? > > for the packaging, it's currently a non-issue, because we don't have a > shared libgnat yet. It builds, but you can't use it, because of
Then, I would say that this GNAT is far from being usable. > undefined references to some libiberty functions. why change the soname, > if upstream doesn't do it. Since it has been raised on the list, I wonder why such a simple issue has not been solved yet. > you may want to ask why libgnat3.15a exists at all ... well to avoid > the delay for new packages when filling the gap ;-) Unless the version changes across 3.1.x releases ;-) Cheers, -- Jérôme Marant http://marant.org -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
