Greetings, and thanks for keeping me informed. Alas, almost all the tests, of which there are 104 in total, fail. Clearly a compiler issue, but more than that I cannot tell from the output.
Thank you very much for your work on this. Take care, Othmar Pasteka <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > hi, > > On Tue, May 28, 2002 at 12:15:39AM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote: > > please try to compile lapack on arm with g77-3.1 and add the results > > to the report. > > good and bad news: > > good first: it compiles and you get .deb packages. i changed > debian/rules in so far that i did s/g77/g77-3.1/ at the arm > section and i also removed the OPTOPTS commentcharacter and added > a -O0. > btw. the same thing happens with -O2 so it compiles even with > higher optimizations but don't know if that counts. > > bad: 100 tests seem to fail. 3 aborted due to SIGILL and > the rest (97) aborted with SIGSEGV. i don't know if there are in > sum 100 tests or if there are more than that. i hope for the > latter. haven't looked at the build log that closely. > > do you want the build log attached to this bug report? because > it's roughly 418kB large. or should i put it at some location? > maybe people.d.o or some such, so that it is kept longer. the > latter isn't a good solution and the first isn't also that nice. > so what do you want? > meanwhile you can get it from > http://people.debian.org/~othmar/lapack_g77-3.1.log > > for the maintainer: i added you to the list because it affects > your package and at least some progress is made, maybe you can > say something about these tests. > > so long > Othmar > > -- Camm Maguire [EMAIL PROTECTED] ========================================================================== "The earth is but one country, and mankind its citizens." -- Baha'u'llah -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]