Philip Blundell writes: > On Sun, 2002-06-09 at 20:26, Martin v. Loewis wrote: > > I don't think that a Debian bug report is the right place to "push" a > > patch into gcc (i.e. to lobby for it). > > > > Instead, you should assume that all patches that have been submitted > > to gcc-patches are implicitly Debian bug reports which already have > > been forwarded upstream. The status of such a report changes when GCC > > maintainers act on the patch (e.g. reject it). > > That's not strictly true. The version of GCC shipped with Debian does > have extra patches applied to it, and lobbying to have another one added > is a reasonable enough thing to do.
Closing the report. We are moving to gcc-3.1 as the default compiler. Better to keep gcc-2.95 unchanged in this situation for a fallback. Maybe you want to test/evaluate the patch for gcc-3.1 or the current HEAD banch and re-submit it upstream? -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]