YAEGASHI Takeshi writes: > Hi, > > In the article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, > NIIBE Yutaka <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > In 3.0.4, we have no Fortran because of nasty reload bugs of SuperH, > > we have no Java because of lack of runtime support. Those two are > > already have been worked done nicely for 3.1. > > > > Forthcoming 3.2 has ABI change for C++, it would become big step for > > us. Although our test coverage status is good for 3.1 (it seems no > > regression against 3.0.4 for C) (and we have new things Java and > > Fortran) , but C++ ABI change is major change. > > Then it would be nice if we could have gcc-3.1(3.2?) debs for SuperH. > Is it possible to mix up objects of gcc-3.0 and g77-3.1 or gcj-3.1?
I think so. But probably it's not worth the trouble. As you see on debian-gcc we plan to change the default compiler to 3.2 for all architectures soon.