Your message dated Thu, 15 Aug 2002 08:34:01 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#156487: fastjar: segfaults when trying to create jar
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 12 Aug 2002 23:21:51 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Aug 12 18:21:51 2002
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from sente.pl [195.117.126.124]
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 17eOVS-0002lU-00; Mon, 12 Aug 2002 18:21:50 -0500
Received: from home.sente.pl ([213.77.64.92] helo=greg.home.sente.pl)
by sente.pl with esmtp (Exim 3.12 #1 (Debian))
id 17eOUA-0000Vn-00; Tue, 13 Aug 2002 01:20:30 +0200
Received: from greg by greg.home.sente.pl with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian))
id 17eOWM-0005LS-00; Tue, 13 Aug 2002 01:22:46 +0200
Subject: fastjar: segfaults when trying to create jar
From: "Grzegorz Prokopski (Debian Developer)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Debian Bug Tracking System" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-Mailer: reportbug 1.99.50
Date: Tue, 13 Aug 2002 01:22:46 +0200
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: Grzegorz Prokopski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Package: fastjar
Version: 1:3.1.1-2 or 3.2-0pre3
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
Fastjar segfaults when trying to create jar archive.
Reverting to version from testing/stable worked.
Invocation:
jar cf ../gjdoc.jar ./Manifest.mf `find . -name \*.class`
gives a bit garbage with "Manifest" word in it and then it segfaults.
Grzegorz B. Prokopski
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
Architecture: i386
Kernel: Linux greg.home.sente.pl 2.4.18-k6 #1 Sun Apr 14 12:43:22 EST 2002 i586
Locale: LANG=pl_PL.ISO-8859-2, LC_CTYPE=pl_PL.ISO-8859-2 (ignored: LC_ALL set)
Versions of packages fastjar depends on:
ii libc6 2.2.5-13 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an
ii zlib1g 1:1.1.4-3 compression library - runtime
-- no debconf information
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 156487-done) by bugs.debian.org; 15 Aug 2002 06:34:19 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Aug 15 01:34:19 2002
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from mail.cs.tu-berlin.de [130.149.17.13] (root)
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 17fED4-0004cK-00; Thu, 15 Aug 2002 01:34:18 -0500
Received: from bolero.cs.tu-berlin.de ([EMAIL PROTECTED] [130.149.19.1])
by mail.cs.tu-berlin.de (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id IAA27121;
Thu, 15 Aug 2002 08:34:01 +0200 (MET DST)
Received: (from [EMAIL PROTECTED])
by bolero.cs.tu-berlin.de (8.11.6+Sun/8.9.3) id g7F6Y1h22807;
Thu, 15 Aug 2002 08:34:01 +0200 (MEST)
From: Matthias Klose <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Thu, 15 Aug 2002 08:34:01 +0200
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED],
"Grzegorz Prokopski (Debian Developer)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Bug#156487: fastjar: segfaults when trying to create jar
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-Mailer: VM 7.03 under 21.4 (patch 6) "Common Lisp" XEmacs Lucid
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Matthias Klose writes:
> Grzegorz Prokopski (Debian Developer) writes:
> > Package: fastjar
> > Version: 1:3.1.1-2 or 3.2-0pre3
> > Severity: grave
> > Justification: renders package unusable
> >
> > Fastjar segfaults when trying to create jar archive.
> > Reverting to version from testing/stable worked.
> >
> > Invocation:
> > jar cf ../gjdoc.jar ./Manifest.mf `find . -name \*.class`
> > gives a bit garbage with "Manifest" word in it and then it segfaults.
>
> I am unable to reproduce this behaviour.
no more information posted. closing the report. please reopen with
more information attached.
