On Tue, 27 Aug 2002 08:36:09 -0400
"Carlos O'Donell" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> > > > It should probably be LD_LIBRARY_PATH=whatever:$${LD_LIBRARY_PATH}
> > > Even better, something like
> > > LD_LIBRARY_PATH=${LD_LIBRARY_PATH:+$LD_LIBRARY_PATH:}whatever.
> > > It's generally not desirable to introduce null path components into
> > > LD_LIBRARY_PATH if it was unset before, see #152099 for example.
> > 
> > Hmm.. there are quite a few packages which already do something like it,
> > I'll cc -devel so that this will get more coverage.
> > 
> 
> I thought that the whole purpose of the "-r" flag to dpkg-buildpackage
> was to get around this sillyness?

That's a different matter, isn't it?

regards,
        junichi

-- 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]  http://www.netfort.gr.jp/~dancer





Reply via email to