Phil Brooke writes: > Sam Tardieu recently orphaned a number of GNAT-related packages. > > I've posted ITAs on three of them: adacgi, adasockets and libgtkada. All > three have new upstream versions (and I need to remind myself what is in > the Debian policy regarding libraries). > > I might post ITAs on asis, gnat-glade and gnat-glade-doc. Less likely, I > might also take up gnat and gnat-doc. (Oh, and gvd. Long day.) > > Before I go any further, can anyone suggest what might happen to the > current gnat and gnat-doc packages, given that the source package gcc-3.2 > includes binaries gnat-3.2, libgnat3.15a and gnat-3.2-doc? > > What I'm really after here is some advice on where things might go with > the packages I'm considering. (I consider myself to be a very new > developer, so I'm trying to tread very carefully indeed!)
you may want to take gnat and gnat-doc, as these are unmaintained. You are welcome to take care of gnat-3.2 and gnat-3.2-doc. For the latter two you would have to send patches to the gcc-3.2 source package.