Zack Weinberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > so indeed it looks like neither 'unix' nor '__unix__' is defined. > (I imagine a patch to define __unix__ would be acceptable, but we > are not adding any more predefined symbols that violate the user's > namespace.)
I'd assume that this would be added through builtin_define, right? In this case, it would define __unix__ and __unix unconditionally, and unix unless -std=c89 is given. However, it would be good to consult NetBSD authors - apparently, their GCC had never defined unix. Regards, Martin