Your message dated Thu, 5 Dec 2002 00:04:54 +0100 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#171689: libstdc++3 depends on gcc-3 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -------------------------------------- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 4 Dec 2002 11:48:59 +0000 >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Dec 04 05:48:59 2002 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from linuz.sns.it (debian) [192.167.206.227] by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian)) id 18JY1T-00079L-00; Wed, 04 Dec 2002 05:48:59 -0600 Received: from bodrato by debian with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 18JY0n-0000At-00; Wed, 04 Dec 2002 12:48:17 +0100 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Marco Bodrato <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: libstdc++3 depends on gcc-3 X-Mailer: reportbug 2.9 Date: Wed, 04 Dec 2002 12:48:17 +0100 Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.6 required=5.0 tests=SPAM_PHRASE_00_01 version=2.41 X-Spam-Level: Package: libstdc++3 Version: 1:3.0.4-13 Severity: minor I do not know the usual behaving in Debian, but I do not understand why the library should depend on the gcc-compiler. I'm not using gcc-3.0 any more, but I can not uninstall it, because some pacages depend on libstdc++3 which depends on gcc-3.0. But the binaries should not depend on the compiler... -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable Architecture: i386 Kernel: Linux debian 2.4.19-piccolo-2 #1 lun dic 2 16:13:19 CET 2002 i686 Locale: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] Versions of packages libstdc++3 depends on: hi gcc-3.0-base 1:3.0.4-12 The GNU Compiler Collection (base hi libc6 2.3.1-3 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an ii libgcc1 1:3.2.1-1 GCC support library. -- no debconf information --------------------------------------- Received: (at 171689-done) by bugs.debian.org; 4 Dec 2002 23:06:13 +0000 >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Dec 04 17:06:13 2002 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from mail.cs.tu-berlin.de [130.149.17.13] (root) by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian)) id 18Jiaq-0001cl-00; Wed, 04 Dec 2002 17:06:12 -0600 Received: from bolero.cs.tu-berlin.de ([EMAIL PROTECTED] [130.149.19.1]) by mail.cs.tu-berlin.de (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id AAA03345; Thu, 5 Dec 2002 00:04:55 +0100 (MET) Received: (from [EMAIL PROTECTED]) by bolero.cs.tu-berlin.de (8.11.6+Sun/8.9.3) id gB4N4sc01479; Thu, 5 Dec 2002 00:04:54 +0100 (MET) From: Matthias Klose <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Thu, 5 Dec 2002 00:04:54 +0100 To: Colin Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Bug#171689: libstdc++3 depends on gcc-3 In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> X-Mailer: VM 7.03 under 21.4 (patch 6) "Common Lisp" XEmacs Lucid Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.2 required=5.0 tests=IN_REP_TO,QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT,REFERENCES,SPAM_PHRASE_00_01 version=2.41 X-Spam-Level: Colin Watson writes: > On Wed, Dec 04, 2002 at 12:48:17PM +0100, Marco Bodrato wrote: > > Package: libstdc++3 > > Version: 1:3.0.4-13 > > Severity: minor > > > > I do not know the usual behaving in Debian, but I do not understand why the > > library should depend on the gcc-compiler. I'm not using gcc-3.0 any more, > > but I can not uninstall it, because some pacages depend on libstdc++3 which > > depends on gcc-3.0. > > But the binaries should not depend on the compiler... > > libstdc++3 does not depend on the compiler, which is in gcc-3.0. It > merely depends on gcc-3.0-base, which contains a few documentation > files. closing the report ...