On Thu, Jan 09, 2003 at 12:22:00AM +0100, Matthias Klose wrote: > wording/spelling/intention clear? > > Description: The GNU Standard C++ Library v3 > This package contains an additional runtime library for C++ programs > built with the GNU compiler. > . > libstdc++-v3 is a complete rewrite from the previous libstdc++-v2, which > was included up to g++-2.95. The first version of libstdc++-v3 appeared > in g++-3.0.
Well, what really confused me was the disconnect between the soversion and the "version". But this happens with other things, too. If it's not a FAQ, then I'd say go with what you've got above and close the bug. If it *is* a FAQ, I suggest explaining the incongruity. :) Thanks for guiding my stupid mind through this. -- G. Branden Robinson | Debian GNU/Linux | If encryption is outlawed, only [EMAIL PROTECTED] | outlaws will @goH7Ok=<q4fDj]Kz?. http://people.debian.org/~branden/ |
pgpIzLz8tH0PM.pgp
Description: PGP signature
