PLEASE REPLY TO [EMAIL PROTECTED] ONLY, *NOT* [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10849
giovannibajo at libero dot it changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|RESOLVED |REOPENED
Resolution|FIXED |
Summary|[3.3/3.4 regression] Cannot |[3.3 regression] Cannot
|define an out-of-class |define an out-of-class
|specialization of a private |specialization of a private
|nested template class |nested template class
------- Additional Comments From giovannibajo at libero dot it 2003-06-29
08:57 -------
Confirmed. Kriang, your 3.3 workaround is not complete because
processing_specialization is set only for explicit specializations, not for
partial specializations.
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
