PLEASE REPLY TO [EMAIL PROTECTED] ONLY, *NOT* [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=9812
------- Additional Comments From doko at cs dot tu-berlin dot de 2003-07-04 20:30 ------- Subject: Re: Bug#177840: [3.3/3.4 regression] [m68k] ICE in extract_insn, at recog.c:2148 wilson at tuliptree dot org writes: > The resulting patch works for this testcase. I suspect we will get > better PIC FP code also, since we aren't needlessly forcing non-XFmode > constants into memory. This gives a medium size patch that will need a > lot of testing, and may not be appropriate for the gcc-3.3.1 release. > > I can't really test this with m68k crosses, and I don't have access to > native m68k hardware. bootstrapped on m68k-linux and i386-linux (together with your patch for PR10021) with no new regressions on the 3.3 branch. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You reported the bug, or are watching the reporter.