PLEASE REPLY TO [EMAIL PROTECTED] ONLY, *NOT* [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11442
------- Additional Comments From falk dot hueffner at student dot uni-tuebingen dot de 2003-10-01 09:29 ------- Subject: Re: [3.3 regression] [arm] invalid assembler on arm "rearnsha at gcc dot gnu dot org" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > You can't put any "asm" in your source code that requires more than > 4 bytes per statement. You have ".skip 16" operations which are > violating this constraint and consequently gcc gets confused in a > way which can only be detected by the assembler. Is this something ARM specific? I can't find anything in the manual about it. If it's a general statement, we can also close 12108. > The compiler does not parse the body of asm statements to divine > their meaning. But it does count the ;'s? ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You reported the bug, or are watching the reporter.
