------- Additional Comments From mark at codesourcery dot com 2004-02-07 20:55 ------- Subject: Re: [3.4/3.5 regression] ICE in cp_expr_size, at cp/cp-lang.c:314 when using a non-trivial object in a compound statement expression
wilson at specifixinc dot com wrote: >------- Additional Comments From wilson at specifixinc dot com 2004-02-07 >09:17 ------- >Subject: Re: [3.4/3.5 regression] ICE in cp_expr_size, at > cp/cp-lang.c:314 when using a non-trivial object in a compound statement > expression > >schwab at suse dot de wrote: > > >>testsuite/g++.dg/ext/stmtexpr1.C >> >> > >Sorry. I misread one of your earlier emails, and was confused about >what the actual testcase was here. Explicitly mentioning the testcase >name helped. > >The following patch seems to work, and also seems to make sense. I have >only tested this with a cross compiler build, and only against the given >testcase. > >This testcase is apparently IA-64 specific only because IA-64 does not >have REG+OFFSET memory addresses, and hence the !rtx_equal_p(temp, >target) test in store_expr fails much more often for IA-64 than other >targets. >2004-02-07 James E Wilson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > * c-common.c (c_expand_expr, case STMT_EXPR): Change expand_expr call > to expand_expr_real call, and pass in alt_rtl as last argument. > > > I was actually just testing the exact same fix. Thanks for fixing this, even thought it was assigned to me! Please check that in, if you would. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11295 ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.