------- Additional Comments From danglin at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-03-20 20:27 ------- > From <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2004-03/msg01045.html>, it does > not look like > it is failing at all.
This run was done at D2004.03.18.20.58.00 (i.e., just before the Kenner patch that caused other breakage because parts of the patch were missed). The following run was done at D2004.03.19.14.19.00. This is just after the last of the fixes applied by Kenner to his original fix: 2004-03-19 Richard Kenner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * cxx-pretty-print.c (pp_cxx_unqualified_id): Use TEMPLATE_TYPE_PARM_INDEX instead of TYPE_FIELDS. * search.c (dfs_unuse_fields): Add two more TREE_CODES that mean the field is named TEMPLATE_TYPE_PARM_INDEX. http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2004-03/msg01046.html There are a huge number of objc test fails in this test run. At a somewhat latter time, we get the error compiling linking.m. I haven't identified which change caused this regression. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14663 ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You reported the bug, or are watching the reporter.