Frank Lichtenheld <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Thu, Nov 11, 2004 at 09:18:50PM +0100, Matthias Klose wrote: >> Brian M. Carlson writes: >> > The copyright file includes a copy of the GNU Free Documentation >> > License, which has been judged by debian-legal to be non-free. Please >> > remove the non-free material from the package or move the package to >> > non-free. >> >> I do not want to believe that debian-legal judges such nonsense, >> i.e. to distribute a licence file with a non DFSG license. It's >> clearly marked which license terms hold for the libgcc_s.so.1. > > I think what he meant was that the documentation licensed under the GFDL > is considered non-free, which is true. This would be a similar bug to #193787 > against gcc-3.3 and sarge-ignore like it.
What documentation? There is none in the libgcc1 package. -- James