Bill Allombert writes: > On Sun, May 22, 2005 at 12:28:21AM +0200, Falk Hueffner wrote: > > Hi, > > > > can you still reproduce this? (Apparently, upstream can't > > (http://gcc.gnu.org/PR19008).) How about newer gcc? > > Hello Falk > > Upstream didn't claim they tried to reproduce the bug, that would > involve actually running the code. > > The status of this bug is not changed: > gcc-3.3 (3.3.6-5) is broken, gcc-3.4 (3.4.3-13) work OK > and gcc 4.0 and 4.1 are too buggy on x86 to be worth testing > on arm.
which 4.0 and 4.1 versions did you test? -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]