Thomas Bushnell BSG writes: > Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > If the gcc maintainers think that pointing g++ at g++-3.4 on these archs is > > the best option, I'm game. One disadvantage is that it wouldn't let us get > > feedback about what else might be wrong with g++-4.0 on those architectures, > > but we probably already have all the information we're going to get about > > the current round of toolchain packages. > > The point I'm making is that it's a *release critical* bug. The > relevant gcc should not be in testing on those archs.
ahh, ok. so you did check that defaulting to g++-3.4 on these archs doesn't reveal another RC bug and we should remove g++-3.4 on these archs as well? Matthias -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
