reassign 367709 tech-ctte thanks > After some more discussion on IRC, we noticed that there are different > interpretations of what the gcc maintainers supposed to have said. For > this reason, I'm re-assigning this bug report to also gcc-4.0. > > Matthias, is there any decision from you whether to add an libstdc++ > udeb or not, and if so, which? Please reassign this bug report back to > the tech ctte until there happens to be a decision everyone is happy > with. Sorry for troubling you, and thanks for your help.
I would like to avoid building libgcc1, libgcc2, libgcc4, libstdc++6 packages if possible. An alternative possibility to build these could be a separate source package b-d on gcc-4.1-source, as currently done by gcj-4.1 and several cross compiler setups. Matthias -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
