On Thu, Aug 17, 2006 at 02:36:19PM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote:
> Nicolas Duboc writes:
> >
> >   Kaloian had already registered this bug on the jython package. Since
> > he discovered that it is a gij bug, 380256's place is here.
> 
> fine, so the jython bug is gone?

   Which jython bug ?

-- 
Nicolas Duboc <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Attachment: pgpxZqdiQXHLs.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to