On Thu, Nov 02, 2006 at 01:23:17PM +0100, Matthias Klose wrote: > Steve Langasek writes: > > On Mon, Oct 23, 2006 at 01:18:35AM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote: > > > Please consider moving the following packages to testing:
> > > gcj-4.1 > > I'm wondering whether the build-dependencies of gcj-4.1 are really > > accurate. > > Is it really the case that gcj-4.1 will build against any version of > > gcc-4.1-source between 4.1.1 and 4.1.2? How is this done, when the gcc-4.1 > > source package appears to incorporate various updates from svn into the > > actual tarball being distributed? Doesn't this imply that gcj-4.1 and > > gcc-4.1 will need to be updated in lockstep? > no, only the upstream tarball is used from gcc-4.1-source. the > patches are used from the gcj-4.1 source. The patches in > gcc-4.1-source are needed to build cross compilers, based on > gcc-4.1-source. My point was that the upstream tarball shipped within the gcc-4.1 source package differs between 4.1.1-13 and 4.1.1-19, and according to the changelog appears to incorporate additional changes from upstream svn. Have I misunderstood? > > A build failure on arm is also the only thing keeping this updated version > > of gcj-4.1 from being hinted into testing, though that seems to have been an > > OOD error on the buildd; given back now. > yes, thanks. Built and uploaded, just waiting for libssp0 binary removal now. Cheers, -- Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world. [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.debian.org/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]