Steve Langasek writes: > On Fri, Jul 20, 2007 at 12:05:54PM +0200, Bastian Blank wrote: > > On Fri, Jul 20, 2007 at 11:51:47AM +0200, Mike Hommey wrote: > > > I have another objection. I'd like all mozilla security updates to be > > > built > > > before gcc 4.2 becomes the default, because they don't build correctly > > > yet, > > > and I am (still) waiting for an upstream comment on how to fix it. > > > The change is done in unstable. Unstable have no security support. > > Should I assume you don't know how to properly build packages for a dist > > which is not unstable? > > He might be referring to the fact that xulrunner has been out-of-date on > mips* for over a month now due to build failures that look like they are > probably a gcc bug, thereby preventing security fixes (and updates to 27 > other significant packages) from reaching testing.
He was asked to report back results with a recent gcc-snapshot; did I miss an answer? -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
