Rene Engelhard writes: > Hi, > > Matthias Klose wrote: > > no, I don't care anymore about "delays" in NEW after having to wait > > about 12 or 13 days for a new binary with the last gcj-4.2 upload. If > > ftp-masters did make the decision that new binary packages have to > > land in NEW, then they should process them in time. What do you gain > > by blocking transitions of depending packages by weeks? Is this really > > wanted? > > And what do you gain from making them (== packages build-deping on > java-gcj-compat-dev) unbuildable (on clean sids, and - more importantly - > on the buildds)?
no, it doesn't change anything, as the new gcj packages did conflict with the new java-gcj-compat. you yourself did point out that in an earlier bug report and did request that conflict. so things are not worse than before. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]