------- Comment #47 from dberlin at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-09-11 19:54 ------- Subject: Re: [4.2/4.3 Regression] points-to analysis slow and memory hungry
On 11 Sep 2007 19:51:00 -0000, belyshev at depni dot sinp dot msu dot ru <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > ------- Comment #46 from belyshev at depni dot sinp dot msu dot ru > 2007-09-11 19:50 ------- > (In reply to comment #45) > > Uh, it's not slow anymore since I committed the patch last month. > > Please define "not slow" :) I said for mainline I'm not backporting even more to 4.2. > > Unlike 4.2, 4.3 r128377 runs out of memory, and it is much slower than 4.1. > Here is output from timevar_print() from gdb at the time it hit the swap > (about > four minutes): > > tree find ref. vars : 15.88 ( 0%) wall 990776 kB ( 0%) ggc > tree PTA : 2.22 ( 0%) wall 23052 kB ( 0%) ggc > tree alias analysis : 13.24 ( 0%) wall 8179 kB ( 0%) ggc > tree call clobbering : 52.63 ( 0%) wall 2020 kB ( 0%) ggc > tree flow sensitive alias: 1.28 ( 0%) wall 123311 kB ( 0%) ggc > tree flow insensitive alias: 21.84 ( 0%) wall 0 kB ( 0%) ggc > tree memory partitioning: 61.98 ( 0%) wall 870 kB ( 0%) ggc > ... > tree operand scan : 21.86( 0%) wall 128117 kB ( 0%) ggc > 2.22 seconds is fast. It only takes 23 meg of memory for PTA. The rest of your memory usage is not my bug. The rest of your time usage is not my bug. If you want to get them fixed, i suggest you file a bug not entitled "points-to analysis slow and memory hungry". -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30052 ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]