------- Comment #2 from paulf at free dot fr 2008-11-15 20:51 ------- I do not agree that this is a duplicate of 6614. 6614 is a consequence of integer promotion, and there is no possible user code change that would make it go away (other than avoiding integral types smaller than int in function arguments).
This bug could be fixed by using the correct types in the assert macro, e.g., __builtin_expect ((long int)!!(expr), 1L) -- paulf at free dot fr changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|RESOLVED |UNCONFIRMED Resolution|DUPLICATE | http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38116 ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]