Matthias Klose wrote: > Luk Claes schrieb: >> Matthias Klose wrote: >>> Matthias Klose schrieb: >>>> There are some more regressions fixed on the gcc-4_3-branch. At least >>>> for some of those we should consider an update. I scanned the branch >>>> for wrong-code regressions with -O2/-O3 and prepared an update at [1]. >>>> No regressions found in the testsuite on i386 and powerpc. The >>>> alternative could be an update to the current gcc-4_3-branch as found >>>> in experimental; no regressions in the testsuite, the code in this >>>> state gets more attention upstream, and I didn't see any regressions >>>> with these updates in Ubuntu (intrepid and jaunty, subset of archs). >>>> Proposing to upload the packages at [1] now, and (after migration to >>>> testing) upload the packages from experimental to unstable. Uploads >>>> of gcj-4.3 and gnat-4.3 should follow the gcc-4.3. uploads. >>> [1] http://people.debian.org/~doko/gcc/4.3/ >> Ok, please go ahead. > > now in unstable, built on all archs, afaics no regressions in the testsuite. > please consider this version for testing.
gcc-4.3 and gcj-4.3 already migrated, gnat-4.3 is already unblocked Cheers Luk -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-gcc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org