On Mon, Aug 23, 2010 at 04:05:32AM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote: > On 21.08.2010 14:56, Julien Cristau wrote: > >On Fri, Aug 20, 2010 at 19:33:12 +0200, Arthur Loiret wrote: > > > >>Now, to be clear, what nice things would gcc-4.5 bring to our users? > >>There is a complete list here [0], but those ones are, in my opinion, > >>very nice: > >> - The new link time optimiser. > >> - Improved C++0x support. > >> - Plugins support. > >> > >My understanding is that lto in 4.5 is not quite there yet. Not that > >I've tried it or anything. > > I don't share your understanding. I tried it for some builds.
I've tried it on the work repository, and lto ICEs the compiler. Plus I get 2 other independant ICEs that I've not had time to reduce (hence the lack of bug report yet). Though this happens with the gcc-4.5 in unstable, I've not tried with the one from experimental yet. -- ·O· Pierre Habouzit ··O madco...@debian.org OOO http://www.madism.org -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-gcc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20100823112104.ge1...@madism.org
