On 28.02.2011 12:49, Cyril Brulebois wrote: > Matthias Klose <d...@debian.org> (28/02/2011): >> wasn't built before. > > strictly speaking, yes. But since we're talking about a gcc package, > that *could* be considered as a regression from previous versions… But > what a hairy reasoning!
maybe, but then, it's an indication that the port is not maintained. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-gcc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4d6b8c46.1050...@debian.org
