On 18.03.2011 18:49, Aurelien Jarno wrote: > On Thu, Mar 17, 2011 at 05:47:55PM +0100, Matthias Klose wrote: >> mips toolchain maintenance during the squeeze release cycle was rough; same >> thing seems to happen again with wheezy, or will this change? > > Except the binutils issue that I agree took too long to be resolved, I > don't remember of any other toolchain issue. Any pointer?
I remember at least the loongson2f issues. Another toolchain unrelated issues is a missing mipsel porter box. >> Current issues include: >> >> - no reply from debian-mips on the GCC-4.5 transition questions > > We are a bit short on the buildd side for mips (and a bit less for > mipsel), so we should probably wait until we get more results from other > architectures. This is especially true now that #618748 has been > reported on the Debian side. applying the first one, the second is not yet reviewed, and not in trunk. >> - gcj/gcc-snapshot build failures with binutils-2.21. >> > > This failure is only 3 days old. I have been able to reproduce it, but I > haven't found time to really debug the issue yet. The failure itself is 3 days old, but snapshots are available in experimental for many months. Maybe it would be a possibility to build gcc snapshots with packages from experimental, alternating uploads to unstable and experimental? Matthias -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-gcc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4d8605f6.1000...@debian.org