Hi, > Libreoffice hasn't yet been built on armhf. I consider libreoffice to be > a reasonablly important package and one that we need to get in before we > can claim we have a reasonablly complete port.
And the segfault described on https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libreoffice/+bug/900636 and experienced on harris, too?: Making: all_bridgetest.dpslo cd ../../unxlngr.pro/lib && : && LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/build/buildd/libreoffice-3.4.4/libreoffice-build/build/libreoffice-3.4.3.2/solver/340/unxlngr.pro/lib${LD_LIBRARY_PATH:+:${LD_LIBRARY_PATH}} /build/buildd/libreoffice-3.4.4/libreoffice-build/build/libreoffice-3.4.3.2/solver/340/unxlngr.pro/bin/uno \ -ro uno_services.rdb -ro uno_types.rdb \ -s com.sun.star.test.bridge.BridgeTest -- \ com.sun.star.test.bridge.CppTestObject /bin/bash: line 1: 11210 Segmentation fault LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/build/buildd/libreoffice-3.4.4/libreoffice-build/build/libreoffice-3.4.3.2/solver/340/unxlngr.pro/lib${LD_LIBRARY_PATH:+:${LD_LIBRARY_PATH}} /build/buildd/libreoffice-3.4.4/libreoffice-build/build/libreoffice-3.4.3.2/solver/340/unxlngr.pro/bin/uno -ro uno_services.rdb -ro uno_types.rdb -s com.sun.star.test.bridge.BridgeTest -- com.sun.star.test.bridge.CppTestObject dmake: Error code 139, while making 'runtest' I don't see a fast sollution soon. (maybe we can just disable java and python etc and look whether that one works, but that would be crippling and I am not sure whether the bridge is also needed for other features. amd64 bugs in the bridges e.g. also affected calc computation back in the past...) I've pointed that one out already on #debian-arm... For the "why do you need mingw-w64?" part, Stephen already answered it correctly. Regards, Rene -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-gcc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20120203093726.45...@gmx.net
