On Fri, Apr 26, 2013 at 01:04:30PM +0200, Ondřej Surý wrote: > I don't object to this, but somehow I fail to grasp the idea that the > result depends on architecture and optimization level.
There are negative number involved. The result is somewhere within 5.0+-$epsilon depending on order of calculation and other parameters. > I would expect consistent results, even consistent *bad* results would be ok. Do you have consistent results on _one_ architecture and _one_ optimization level? Bastian -- Mind your own business, Spock. I'm sick of your halfbreed interference. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-gcc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20130426120929.ga1...@waldi.eu.org
