Am 22.08.2013 21:32, schrieb Thorsten Glaser: > Hi! > > Despite mentioning PR52306 in the changelog (as I did) > you seem to have rejected pr52306-retry-hack.diff which > is a bit unfortunate as we really need a workaround for > that ICE to build some things in the archive, e.g. Qt4, > Qt5 and anything using it, mcabber, etc. > > Do you outright reject this patch even if it’s just > “for the time being”? If so, would you accept a patch > that just disables -fauto-inc-dec on m68k *always*, > even in the cases where it doesn’t ICE? (one-liner)
yes, I do reject this. not many thanks for trying to sneak in this into the Debian package. Sure, I'll remove the changelog entry. Matthias -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-gcc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/52167d37.90...@debian.org