On Tue, Sep 30, 2014 at 06:10:27PM +0200, Aurelien Jarno wrote: > On Fri, Sep 12, 2014 at 07:34:36PM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote: > > Am 12.09.2014 um 15:13 schrieb Thibaut Paumard: > > > While it's your prerogative to decrease the severity, please note that > > > this bug means that all the packages that build-depend on gdc (22 > > > packages in jessie) are currently in an FTBFS-state on kfreebsd. > > > > sure, and they still will ftbfs without libphobos. > > There are a few others architectures which build gdc, but which do not > build libphobos-dev. What makes kfreebsd special there, and why do we > need this gdc -> libphobos-dev dependency (which wasn't there in > previous versions of the package)? > > For me it looks like a patch like the following one will fix the > problem: > > Index: rules > =================================================================== > --- rules (révision 7672) > +++ rules (copie de travail) > @@ -264,7 +264,7 @@ > go_archs = amd64 arm64 armel armhf i386 ia64 mips mipsel \ > powerpc ppc64 ppc64el s390 s390x x32 > > -phobos_archs = amd64 armel armhf i386 x32 kfreebsd-amd64 kfreebsd-i386 > +phobos_archs = amd64 armel armhf i386 x32 > > ifneq (,$(filter $(DEB_HOST_ARCH), $(multilib_archs))) > with_multilib = yes > > Of course having libphobos would be even better, but that can be done in > a later step.
As nobody shouted against my above proposal, I guess it's the way to go. I have just committed the change to the SVN. Matthias could you please upload it, or if you don't have time can I just upload it myself? Aurelien -- Aurelien Jarno GPG: 4096R/1DDD8C9B aurel...@aurel32.net http://www.aurel32.net -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-gcc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/20141002184130.ga13...@volta.rr44.fr