On Sat, Mar 16, 2019 at 05:59:16PM +0100, Matthias Klose wrote: > On 11.03.19 18:47, Santiago Vila wrote: > > On Mon, Mar 11, 2019 at 06:34:18PM +0100, Matthias Klose wrote: > > > >> I have no clue, I have never seen that before, and it seems to work fine > >> on the > >> buildds, and in the cross-toolchain-base* package's autopkg test. > >> Starting here > >> a build with -j1 to see if it's reproducible. > >> > >> Is this seen with gcc-7-cross and gcc-9-cross as well? > > > > It happened to me with the (now removed) gcc-7-cross as well, yes. > > In case it helps, these are the logs I had in my last backup: > > > > https://people.debian.org/~sanvila/build-logs/gcc-7-cross/ > > > > (Never tried gcc-9-cross yet because my usual target is testing and > > sometimes sid). > > a gcc-9 build with -j1 succeeds. I'm not spending more time on this.
I'm confused. What do you mean by "a gcc-9 build"? Did you try to build gcc-9-cross instead of gcc-8-cross, which is the package in the bug report? Or you mean that you tried to build gcc-8-cross using gcc-9 as the C compiler? Thanks.