Soren,

On Mon, 16 Sept 2024 at 22:38, Soren Stoutner <so...@debian.org> wrote:
>
> Dmitry,
>
> Thanks for your quick answers below.
>
> Piuparts fails because of the following:
>
> The following packages have unmet dependencies:
>    cpp-doc : Depends: cpp-14-doc (>= 14.2.0-1~) but it is not installable
>    gcc-doc : Depends: gcc-14-doc (>= 14.2.0-1~) but it is not installable
>    gccgo-doc : Depends: gccgo-14-doc (>= 14.2.0-1~) but it is not installable
>    gfortran-doc : Depends: gfortran-14-doc (>= 14.2.0-1~) but it is not
> installable
>
> It looks like Debian currently has cpp-13-doc (I assume the rest are the
> same).  Do these packages need to be updated at the same time?

gcc-14-doc has been uploaded by Bastian German (BTW, Bastian, thank
you) and is currently waiting for the NEW processing.
I don't know what are his plans for gcc-doc-defaults.

>
> On Monday, September 16, 2024 1:31:16 PM MST Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
> > Soren,
> >
> > On Mon, 16 Sept 2024 at 22:27, Soren Stoutner <so...@debian.org> wrote:
> > > Dmitry,
> > >
> > > debian/source/format lists this package as 3.0 (native).  Is Debian the
> > > upstream for this package?
> >
> > Yes, see how gcc-defaults handle the same case.
> >
> > > You should delete the debian/compat file as it is deprecated.
> > >
> > > In debian/control you should build-depend on "debhelper (= 13)".
> >
> > Ack.
> >
> > > You should add "Rules-Requires-Root: no” to debian/control (I assume you
> > > don’t need root to build this package).
> >
> > Ack.
> >
> > > As an example, see:
> > >
> > > https://salsa.debian.org/soren/privacybrowser/-/blob/master/debian/
> control?
> > > ref_type=heads
> > >
> > > debian/copyright says:
> > >
> > > Source: <ftp://ftp.gnu.org/gnu/gcc/gcc-4.9.1/gcc-4.9.1.tar.bz2>, notice
> > >
> > >  that this package only contains several license files.
> > >
> > > Is that current?
> >
> > Yes, we haven't been updating it since that time, it wasn't required.
> >
> > > Comment:
> > >  This package was put together by Nikita V. Youshchenko <yo...@debian.org>
> > >  on Mon, 18 Sep 2006 00:34:35 +0400.
> > >  .
> > >  Copyright (C) 2006, Nikita V. Youshchenko <yo...@debian.org>
> > >
> > > This looks obsolete (replaced by the debian/* entry).
> >
> > Ack.
> >
> > > Can you give me a little bit of background on why parts of this package
> are
> > > non-free?  I am having a hard time imagining that the Free Software
> > > Foundation released a bunch of documentation that isn’t DFSG-free.
> >
> > The documentation is released under GFDL with invariant sections. It's
> > considered non-DFSG-free.
>
>
> --
> Soren Stoutner
> so...@debian.org



-- 
With best wishes
Dmitry

Reply via email to