Hallo Dalibor, * Dalibor Topic wrote: >>>class if they don't appear on the command line. Well, surprise, >>>kaffe's java compiler, kjc, does not, and there is no spec saying a >>>compiler needs to do it. >> IMO, in this cases its better to go with 'everybody'... This should be >> a one line change... >I don't think so. [...]
I meant just the rt.jar. The rest must anyway be dealt with by the DD, as the Dependency information needs to be setup. >> Then at least the unfree should be made working with our packaging. >I can't tell people what to do with their time, though I'd prefer to >see people helping to make free as in speech java implementations >rock, instead of making it easy to trade freedom for comfort. But IMO, we shouldn't force them to it. Or punish them with fixing a problem, which could easily be dealt with at packing level. especially as we are not talking about some tiny special program, but java. Jan -- Jan Schulz [EMAIL PROTECTED] "Wer nicht fragt, bleibt dumm." -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]