On Thu, Apr 14, 2005 at 09:55:12AM +0100, Andrew Suffield wrote: > On Thu, Apr 14, 2005 at 03:37:02PM +1000, Hamish Moffatt wrote: > > You wrote 'specification', I wrote 'standards documents'. > > I call things by their real names. A 'standards document' is a > specification promoted by a self-proclaimed 'standards body'. The
Good for you. I note that you completely failed to address the rest of my message. I assume that means you couldn't refute it. > It's just more documentation. Free software needs *free* documentation. Assuming I agree, what's that got to do with standards documents (or specifications, if you like)? RFCs, for example, describe protocols which is not software. Hamish -- Hamish Moffatt VK3SB <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
