Mark Brown wrote:
On Sat, Jun 04, 2005 at 03:48:22PM +0100, MJ Ray wrote:
Mark Brown wrote:
It doesn't seem like an unreasonable concern for them to be raising.
As a bug. It's not reasonable to bring it here the next day.
No, but not quite so obviously malicious as you seem to feel either.
Since the main issue on my mind was "do people feel that it is ok that
this goes into the sarge release?", exactly what would have been proper
procedure? How long should I have waited before bringing it to the list?
I anticipated somewhat different responses than what I have received;
When discussing and demonstrating it to friends, they have been more of:
"OMG!, thanks for warning me, this is pretty horrible. I will disable it
immediately." However, given how people have responded here, apparently
the whole thing isn't such a big issue.
Also, I never really imagined that there would be people counter-arguing
that the only problem is my moral values, and thus implicitly state that
to them WebCollage indeed is completely safe-for-work. Have you people
actually looked at WebCollage? Anyway, just to show that I am at least
not utterly alone, here are a few googled examples of people who
apparently share my unreasonable and silly moral values:
http://www.ozzu.com/ftopic38523.html
http://software.newsforge.com/comments.pl?sid=43148&cid=105055
http://austinlug.org/archives/alg/2005-01/msg00247.html
http://www.genehack.com/
(Search pages for 'collage' to find the relevant section).
//Rickard
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]