On Sun, 17 Dec 2000, Christian Kurz wrote: > Well, what you propose here is an an removal of a debian developer and I > don't think this should be so easy as you describe it. We should be able > to have a checklist and if some checks fail delete his debian account. > If someone is really MIA and won't come back, we should only disable > first his account, so that he needs to contact us again, to show that he > has again enough time for debian, but an exclusion should only happen > after a vote, so that either the majority of developers agreed or not. > > About the take-over of a package, have you read the nice document on > qa.debian.org, that Raphael Hertzog and I wrote some time ago, to take > care of this situation? We already have some guidelines, but they are > just not used. :( So there's no real need to invent the wheel again, but > to take the current situation and documents and apply them to debian.
I've seen these not yet used guidelines for taking over packages and I don't want to take the account of a member of Debian "easy". But I don't want to start this discussions before the NM discussion has shown results - one big discussion at a time is enough. > Ciao > Christian cu, Adrian -- A "No" uttered from deepest conviction is better and greater than a "Yes" merely uttered to please, or what is worse, to avoid trouble. -- Mahatma Ghandi