On Thu, Sep 23, 2004 at 08:53:39PM +0200, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: > > Thank you for not abusing our secret mailinglist for irrelevant stuff > like pointing fingers at (cute?) attempts to follow our Social Contract. > > Feel free to quote my parts of this email in public! > > I see nothing secret in any of this email, and thus encourage responses > to be targeted debian-project instead of this secret list. > Obviously, debian-private contains many messages that have no secret content. This message was another example of this fact. It is wrong for a person to equate d-private == secret_content. The fact that we have rules concerning d-private seems to be the fly in the ointment. Secrecy is only one rule. Perhaps we should be talking about the rules in general. If a concensus developed about the rules, I think we would see less bickering on d-private. I doubt if we could eliminate it all, because flamage was created in our geek community ;-)
Richard P.S. I barely keep up with d-private. So if you want me to see d-project replies, then CC me because I will not subscribe to this list too.