On Wed, Jan 05, 2005 at 09:54:38AM +0100, David Weinehall wrote: > On Wed, Jan 05, 2005 at 07:36:02PM +1100, Craig Sanders wrote: > [snip] > > > "wannabe-Holier-Than-Stallman zealots" is not a rebuttal, it's merely a > > succinct description of the anti-GFDL crowd. > > Not agreeing with you does not necessarily make people zealots.
i never said it did. being insanely pedantic & obsessive about licensing trivialities does, however, make one a zealot. > Because that's the only kind of "modification by patch" that the GFDL > allows for. "patch" is not restricted to the controlling input to patch(1) - or to any particular program or method. craig -- craig sanders <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (part time cyborg)