Daniel Ruoso <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> skribis: > So, are we going to stablish the criterias for organizations to have the > right of using the Debian name? Like a type of fair-use?
Not me in the forseeable. spi-trademark would be the next step, but it was just my opinion on a question you asked. > [...] ... so ... > Couldn't we just avoid the problem by acting reactivelly? I mean, do you > really think that DUS is not a fair-use of the Debian trademark? No, it's a business trading as debian, sprung on its members as a done deal. As Phil Hands posted about DCC, it seems either malicious or stupid and "either way I don't see how we can trust them to be issuing statements which will be perceived by the world to have come from the project." > Do you realize that it will impact all user groups around which uses > the Debian name? Ones who are pure user groups and don't trade shouldn't be changed. Ones who are trading on the name may need to act, but they're in a grey area at the minute if they don't have permission, so won't be worse off either. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
