Radu-Cristian FOTESCU <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > --- Joerg Jaspert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> a écrit : >> That was done by me for Cebit, like we did for some other years already. > > Well, it seems to lack the proper labeling then. > >> -legal is the wrong list for this, there is no legal issue behind that. > > I thought this is not official! > 1. The magazine (on the Web; I have not buyed it) didn't said it was a > "special CeBIT edition".
But it says "Debian sarge special", > 2. It clearly contains packages not on the official update list. AFAIK, > backports like FF1.5 and X.org are not _official_ for Sarge. it advertises explicitly that this is an updated version of sarge, after talking about Debian's conservative version policy. Do you understand german? > I'm not very sure "it happened to". It's for sale now, labeled "sarge". No, it isn't labelled "sarge". > Sorry to say such things and possibly raise conflictual feelings, but do you > really feel this is *right*? Even if it is not, it's off-topic on -legal. Please continue this on -project; note that I'm not subscribed there. Regards, Frank -- Frank Küster Single Molecule Spectroscopy, Protein Folding @ Inst. f. Biochemie, Univ. Zürich Debian Developer (teTeX/TeXLive)