On Tue, Feb 13, 2007 at 11:26:58PM +0100, Josip Rodin wrote: > > > Having a record of who voted for whom is a good default. Since we don't > > > have any typical real-world election abuses in Debian (e.g. intimidation > > > or harming of people who voted for someone you don't like), I see no > > > serious negative consequences to publishing the votes. > > > > "I don't like this person, but I have to work with him in this project, > > so I would like to hide that fact from him/her. I don't want to rank > > him/her above NOTA, but I also don't want to have to explain that" > > Okay, that's a good point. I'm not automatically convinced that it's a > seriously negative thing, however. This kind of openness can obviously > cause some friction, but do we have any real evidence that says it's > an insurmountable obstacle?
Resurrecting this old thing for another question that came to me now - would it make sense to postpone the publication of votes in soc-ctte elections? Like, publish the list of voters after a year or two? By that time, time itself should have eroded much of the problem... -- 2. That which causes joy or happiness. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]