-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Tue, Apr 15, 2008 at 10:06:45PM +0200, Andreas Schuldei wrote: >* Gunnar Wolf ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [080415 19:45]: >> Umh... I know this will sound quite boring to you - But I (and I >> guess, many of the Debian people) do not like the idea of presenting >> testing/unstable snapshots as something ready for the end-user to >> install. Hey, if they want unstable software, why not try >> Ubuntu?</joke> > >i dont think that is a reasonable approach. if "testing" quality >is good enough and useful to people why would you hide away that >it is debian under the hood by rebranding it? Why deny debian a >good marketing opportunity where "debian" or "debi" can be found >in other places then the debian/control file?
I believe that you won't upset or confuse anyone if you... - Call it "Debian" only if it is indeed (some subset of) Debian. - Call it "based on Debian" if some but not all is Debian. - Call it "stable" only if all is from the current stable release. See also the recent thread at debian-custom... - Jonas - -- * Jonas Smedegaard - idealist og Internet-arkitekt * Tlf.: +45 40843136 Website: http://dr.jones.dk/ - Enden er nær: http://www.shibumi.org/eoti.htm -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFIBRsDn7DbMsAkQLgRAuhRAKCWvt9qifTt38dPThYaVHl8PDemRgCeJIzk 6se2vggw02bI6ePT8slYz0s= =GAYF -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----